Use Case: KIT/Using heat storage to minimize heat use and provide electrical flexibility
Search
Asset Publisher
Description Of The Use Case
Name of use case
Use case identification | ||
ID | System configuration(s) | Name of use case |
UC11 | SC Office Buildings 445 and 449 at KIT | Minimize heating, cooling and electrical energy consumption via Model Predictive Control |
Version management
Version management |
| |||
Version No. | Date | Author(s) | Changes | Approval status |
| 19/06/2017 | A.Engelmann | Added MPC building Use Case | Draft |
| 05/07/2017 | A.Engelmann | Added electrical storage | Draft |
Scope and objectives of use case
Scope and objectives of use case | |
Scope | [Why? Motivation and high-level objectives] To meet the goal of reducing energy consumption of buildings (and thereby CO2 emissions), advanced control schemes can be used to lower the energy consumption of buildings. Thereby the incorporation of weather forecasts, advanced building models and the active use of heat/cold storages should lower the consumption of limited resources. Another aim is to reduce the needed amount of grid expansion at campus and the volatility in the grid. We try to achieve this by a combination of load shifting and the use of an electrical storage (peak shaving). [What? System under discussion, main functions, main actors] The considered building is equipped with a weather station and partial measurements of incoming heat of a distinct heating system. Whether or not we get active control access to the heating system heating system has to be clarified. Control variables could be the temperature of a heat storage, temperatures of the concrete core activation system, control of windows and the room temperature itself within certain bounds. An electrical storage is currently in planning. |
Objective(s) | [identify specific objectives] O1: Minimize energy consumption satisfying temperature bounds in the building O2: Minimize fluctuation in building energy consumption O3: Minimize fluctuation in electrical energy consumption by means of the electrical storage (peak shaving) |
Belongs to use case group (if applicable) | [Specify an arbitrary group name here in order to link multiple related UCs together] Building Energy Management |
Narrative of use case
Narrative of use case |
Short description |
[How? Free text description of main function of controller and how it interacts with most relevant actors (Controllers & Control signals] The occupants of the rooms have to agree on temperature limits of the building, such that they can be used as heat storages. One possible control scheme would be Model Predictive Control (MPC). The MPC controller incorporates a state space model of the building and calculates based on the available measurements an optimal control signal. An extension would be, to incorporate weather predictions in the decision. Based on that, the controller calculates optimal control inputs for the heating system, the cooling system and the concrete core activation minimizing the consumed energy of the building. The coupling between electrical consumption and heat consumption can be optimized simultaneously by using the heating/cooling system and the electrical storage.
|
Complete description |
[More verbose description; include for example details about control domain, requirements towards input signals or applicable system operating modes (normal, emergency, …) ]
|
Optimality Criteria
(Directly associated with objectives. E.g. by what metric to 'minimise' something)
Optimality Criteria | |||
ID | Name | Description | Reference to mentioned use case objectives |
C1 | Maximize efficiency | Minimize the energy consumption of the building in terms of the heating/cooling system. | O1 |
C2 | Minimize fluctuation | Minimize the fluctuation in energy consumption to relieve the distinct heating system. | O2
|
C3 | Minimize electrical fluctuation | Minimize the fluctuation in electrical energy consumption to relieve the campus grid. | O3 |
Use case conditions
Use case conditions |
Assumptions |
[Assumption; assumed relation to other systems: e.g. higher level controller sends a signal]
|
Prerequisites |
[Triggering Event (update of control signal or disturbance ...)] The required sampling period depends on the time constants of the system dynamics and the required control performance. A rough estimate of one recalculation per minute is reasonable from our point of view. In case of the electrical storage the time constants are much smaller, i.e. peak shaving can be performed in time scales up to one second. |
General remarks
General remarks |
[everything which doesn't fit in any of the other categories]. Whether or not we get control access to the devices must be clarified. |
Graphical RepresentationS Of Use Case
Graphical representation(s) of use case |
a) Model Predictive Control
|
Technical Details
Actors
Actors | |||
Grouping | Group description | ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
Actor name | Actor type | Actor description | Further information specific to this use case |
Occupants | Human | Occupants of the temperature controlled rooms | The occupants specify the maximum/minimum temperature of the building. |
Predictive controller | System | The system controlling the temperatures of the building | There is a centralized controller which controls all temperatures and heat flows simultaneously. |
Step By Step Analysis Of Use Case Optional
Overview of use case scenarios
Identify all relevant use case scenarios; rel. e.g. to Sequence Diagram or Use Case diagram
Scenario conditions | ||||||
No. | Scenario name | Scenario description | Primary actor | Triggering event | Pre-condition | Post-condition |
1 | Minimize energy consumption |
| Heat flows, air flows, window positions
| Available measurements regarding the heating/cooling, weather forecast |
| Controller has recalculated controller response based on new input |
2 | Minimize fluctuation in energy consumption |
| Heat flows, air flows, window positions
| Available measurements regarding the heating/cooling, weather forecast |
| Controller has recalculated controller response based on new input |
3 | Minimize fluctuation in electrical energy consumption |
| Electrical storage | Available measurements regarding the electricity consumption |
| Controller has recalculated controller response based on new input |
Steps – Scenarios
Alternative / complementary to sequence diagrams.
Scenario | ||||||||
Scenario name : |
| |||||||
Step No. | Event | Name of process/ activity | Description of process/ activity | Service
| Information producer (actor) | Information receiver (actor) | Information exchanged (IDs) | Requirements R-ID |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Terms And Definitions
Common terms and definitions | |
Term | Definition |
Model Predictive Control (MPC) | An MPC controller controls the system by repeatedly applying an optimal control scheme to the system. By doing so, one get optimal control inputs in the sense of a specified criterion. Predictions can be incorporated in the control scheme. |